40-year-old Vancouver Aquatic Centre could be demolished

40-year-old Vancouver Aquatic Centre could be demolished (updated)
 

The 40-year-old Vancouver Aquatic Centre on Beach Avenue could be demolished and replaced with a new facility near the Granville Bridge under a proposed real estate sale offered by the City of Vancouver.

Photograph by: Ian Lindsay , PNG

The aging, 40-year-old Vancouver Aquatic Centre on Beach Avenue could be demolished and replaced with a new facility near the Granville Bridge under a proposed real estate sale offered by the City of Vancouver.

News of the potential arrangement — still a long way from reality — caught many off guard Wednesday, even though it's contained in a city information package that has been available to potential buyers since May 12.

The city has invited offers on 12 parcels of land contained within the Granville Bridge's northeast off-ramp and loop, which will be decommissioned and removed.

The land has a total assessed value of $36.14 million and bids from potential buyers are being accepted until Aug. 15.

The city's "invitation for innovative offers" on the site notes it wants a "renewed" Vancouver Aquatic Centre on the property, to be built by a developer and transferred back to the city for a nominal fee of $10.

Nicholas Chernen, a Cedar Party council candidate in the Vancouver city elections this fall, feels there hasn't been enough community discussion on the proposed redevelopment of the site.

"Why not consult with citizens before putting something up for sale that has so many core components?" he said. "What would happen to the old Vancouver Aquatic Centre site? Does it become a park or does the city sell the land off? It's probably the crown jewel of Vancouver waterfront property now."

NPA park board commissioner John Coupar, who only heard about the potential new aquatic centre development on Wednesday, feels the city should have been more transparent about such an important issue.

"When you're dealing with such a valued amenity as the aquatic centre, you can actually create fear and uncertainty in people's mind by not being open," he said. "It's better to be open and transparent."

Vision Vancouver had been hit with similar criticism over the past year from angry residents who claimed they hadn't been properly consulted on long-term community plans for neighbourhoods like Marpole and Grandview-Woodland. The Vision-dominated city council responded to the vocal opposition by extending consultation deadlines and revamping its plans.

But Vision Vancouver park board chair Aaron Jasper said Coupar might be "stepping across the line" by casting aspersions on the latest process.

"He's speculating and electioneering, as far as I'm concerned," he said. "There is no plan to relocate (the aquatic centre) now and if there ever is an option to relocate, the park board will be briefed."

Jasper said the aquatic centre, which opened in 1974, clearly needs to be upgraded but estimates it would cost about $40 million to rebuild it on its current location and that money has not been set aside in the next four-year capital plan.

"The prospect of having to find $40 million to rebuild on site is quite a challenge so I would be open to considering any alternative," he said. "It would be silly for us not to be open to these ideas."

Bill Aujla, the city's general manager of real estate and facilities management, stressed the city is simply looking for innovative ideas from developers and is not bound to accept any offers.



Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business/commercial-real-estate/year+Vancouver+Aquatic+Centre+could+demolished+updated/10076518/story.html#ixzz3AsxoM2mg

Read full post
Categories
The data relating to real estate on this website comes in part from the MLS® Reciprocity program of either the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV), the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board (FVREB) or the Chilliwack and District Real Estate Board (CADREB). Real estate listings held by participating real estate firms are marked with the MLS® logo and detailed information about the listing includes the name of the listing agent. This representation is based in whole or part on data generated by either the REBGV, the FVREB or the CADREB which assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. The materials contained on this page may not be reproduced without the express written consent of either the REBGV, the FVREB or the CADREB.